Bridging Finance News

Masthaven voted “Best short term lender” at NACFB awards

November 22nd, 2010

Masthaven Bridging Finance were the winners of “Best short term lender” at Thursday night’s NACFB annual awards gala dinner held at the Hilton in Birmingham.

Voted for by members of the association, these awards are often referred to as the bridging and commercial Oscars, and easily the most prestigious in the industry.

Over 400 black tie and cocktail dress wearing industry leading lights were entertained, fed and watered in sumptuous surroundings before the awards were given out to rapturous applause.

Sales and Marketing Director Richard Deacon commented –  “ We are thrilled to bits with this award. It means so much to us as it is voted for by the association members who have used us for their bridging finance requirements. It means we are doing the job well, and to beat the other names who were up for the award just goes to show that with our 30 years experience we really know how to get the deal done”

Bookmark and Share

Cricket hero forced to slash £1.5m off mansion he has never lived in

November 15th, 2010

A former cricket star has become another victim of the housing market slump after failing to secure an offer on his six-bedroom mansion, put on the market for £5 million.

Andrew Flintoff – aka ‘Freddie’ Flintoff – has been forced to reduce the asking price on his property by a not inconsiderable sum of £1.5 million.

Situated in Withinlee Road in Cheshire, recently retired Andrew Flintoff has also switched estate agents in an effort to encourage a buyer.

The Ashes hero, 32, has never lived in the house which he developed with his wife Rachael after purchasing the property from Fulham manager Mark Hughes.

According to the Daily Mail, a source said: “Freddie has been stumped as to why the house hasn’t sold the £5 million asking price.

“It really is a stunning property and in the most prestigious road in the area. He decided to switch estate agents and knock £1.5 million off the asking price.”

The house was originally bought in the October 2007 for £1,850,000. Mark Hughes’ property development company Mark Dafydd Developments Ltd had secured planning permission but Freddie resubmitted even grander plans to the council to create a house double the size.

The source added: “There was a lot of objection to it because people thought it was far too big but after initially withdrawing the plans he was successful in getting the go-ahead.

“It even has two pools in the basement, one for the adults and a splash pool which would have been for his children.

“It has a ‘smart system’ built into it which can control everything from running your bath, closing your curtains, turning on the sprinklers in the garden and ensuring the security and safety of the building.”

Andrew and his wife, who planned to retire in the house, have now decided to move to Dubai as they have already settled there.

Last December Withinlee Road was named one of the most expensive streets to live on outside of Southern England in the annual ‘top streets’ table compiled by the Halifax with an average house price of £1.2million.

Although the area boasts inhabitants such as Wayne Rooney, Carlos Tevez and Michael Carrick, Freddie’s house is the most expensive property ever to be offered for sale on the exclusive area.

Masthaven offer a range of property development loans

Bookmark and Share

AOBP announces encouraging response and confirms stand at MBE

November 15th, 2010

The Association of Bridging Professionals (AOBP) has announced an ‘encouraging first four weeks’, and says it has had a ‘fantastic reception from bridging professionals across the sector.’

Executive Committee Member and Director of W&B Mortgages Lucy Barrett said: “So far the association has been extremely well received by both brokers and lenders, and we have made great progress in getting both on board with the concept.”

The AOBP will be exhibiting at the Mortgage Business Expo on the 11-12 November and the association invites delegates to visit executive committee members who will be on stand H6A throughout.

Miss Barrett said: “We see the Expo as a fantastic opportunity to talk to brokers about what we aim to achieve, and more importantly to hear their thoughts on the Association too, as this is vital to the success of the AOBP.”

Founder of MoneyWales.com Lindsey Doyle recently joined the association and said: “I have known the Chairman, Sidney Cohen, for a long time – he is such a larger than life character, a fountain of knowledge and I have a huge amount of trust in him.

“I have been in the finance industry for 30 years and recognition by a trade body like this is very good – it gives substance and creditability to my brand.”

AOBP has confirmed that seven bridging lenders have been made affiliate lenders, including Drawbridge Finance.

Mark Posniak, Head of Marketing & Operations at Drawbridge, said: “We are pleased to be an Affiliate Member. Anything that will help improve the quality of business transacted and support brokers can only be a good thing.

“The proof will be in the months to come as the organisation progresses, and hopefully starts to build value. We have joined to see if we can add value to it, and of course gain value. Drawbridge insists on always being part of the discussion.”

The Association says it has seen a ‘good uptake’ from bridging professional across the sectors, including compliance experts, solicitors and law firms.

Paul Rich, Director at Griffiths Ings, a firm recently made an Affiliate Member, said: “There are many reasons why we eventually joined. It is important for us to be close to people in the industry and being involved is great for business, especially after the property market has been so bad.”

Commercial bridging loans

Bookmark and Share

A View from the Rostrum by Property Auctioneer, Felix Rigg

November 15th, 2010

Here we are in the middle of a recession and you’d expect me, a commercial property auctioneer, to be far too busy selling distressed stock to write this article. The fact is, though, that I’m not.

A quick look at auction statistics produced by Essential Information (eigroup.co.uk) confirms that my market has seen some substantial reductions. Over the 12 months to the end of September 2010, the commercial auction market has raised just 43% of the amount raised in the equivalent period 2006-7 (in my opinion, the peak of the market). Meanwhile, across the same respective periods our success rate has dipped, from 80.1% to 71.7%.

So where are all those bargains you’d normally expect to see in auction catalogues as a result of loan defaults and debt recovery processes?

Hitherto, there have been very few high-profile instances of property lenders “pulling plugs” on loans that are in breech, unless interest payments are not being met or the borrower has proved to be unreliable or uncooperative. The reason for this still remains unclear to those of us outside the banking world, but it feels almost as if there is a great inter-bank decision not to crystallise losses on loans where the value of the asset against which the loan is secured has dropped markedly. At any rate, banks have avoided revaluing these assets to establish a true current value, adopting what appears to be a “head in the sand” attitude toward technical breaches of covenant.

Of course, this is not the case where interest payments are not met. And yet how often does this happen? Tenant defaults and the consequent lack of rental income are the usual reasons for a borrower to default on interest payments. Fortunately, this recession has yet to witness widespread business failure and, thus, the levels of defaults are not as high as predicted by some as the recession unfolded.

However, property loans don’t last forever. The vast majority are cast in five-year terms, after which they must be either refinanced or paid back in full. In pre credit crunch times, refinancing was much easier than it will be today. And, counting forward five years, it is easy to see that the loans made in the absolute boom times of 2006 and early 2007 will be maturing across the next 24 months.

What will happen? The banking system has neither the means nor, frankly, the appetite to refinance all those loans. In some cases, the banks may have to opt for a brief extension of a year or so (this is happening already on some earlier maturities). Other banks, such as West Bromwich Building Society, have already announced their intention to wind down over time their property lending side altogether.

Most recently, this problem loomed for Norwich-based property investor Targetfollow, whose plug was finally pulled by their bankers last week with a reported £700 million of loans overdue and no sure way to repay them. What happens to the Targetfollow portfolio over the next few weeks and months may well be a pattern for what is to come.

The problems will be most acute where asset values have slipped considerably from the levels ascribed at the time the loan was granted. This is very likely to happen in the case of a secondary investment property that was purchased during that boom period of 2006 – 7, unless its value has been somehow enhanced in the meantime through adroit asset management. Whether banks can afford to keep such devalued assets as security seems less likely in the wake of Basle, leading one to the conclusion that the banks may end up – whether they like it or not – in charge of a lot of property that they will then have to sell.

You will gather from the above that, whilst I may not be as busy as I would like at the moment, I am expecting to become very much busier from about this time next year onwards. Before then, I will still have time to suggest a few ways of finding bargains in the auction rooms and also how to avoid pitfalls that can lead to expensive mistakes. But that will have to wait until next time.

Felix Rigg is a partner and principal auctioneer at King Sturge LLP
www.kingsturge.co.uk

Bookmark and Share

Bridging lender blames FSA fine on 'old school' practices

November 15th, 2010

In a major blow to the bridging finance industry, last week saw short term lender Bridging Loans Ltd and its director Joseph Cummings become the first bridging firm and director to be fined by the FSA for serious failures relating to lending practices.

Bridging Loans Ltd was dealt a £42,000 fine, whilst Mr Cummings received a £70,000 fine – reduced from £100,000 for agreeing to settle at an early stage of the investigation.

The firm did, however, retain its FSA authorisation.

In a statement released by the regulator, Mr Cummings was said to have shown “total disregard for the interest of his customers”.

Not only did the director receive a Final Notice, but so did three members of his family; Miriam Cummings, Laura Cummings and Susan Cummings, who have been banned from undertaking any “significant influence function” at a financial services firm.

In a statement released by the firm, issued exclusively to Bridging and Commercial, Bridging Loans Ltd denied refusing the FSA access to their office and blamed Mr Cummings’ ‘old school’ lending practices for the fines.

“We obtained approval in 2004 to undertake regulated lending. In June 2009 we first became aware that parts of our administration were being conducted in breach of the Regulations.

“Contrary to what is stated in the FSA Press Release, Bridging Loans Ltd and its directors did co-operate with the FSA and access was provided to all of our files.

“One of the main problems was that Mr Cummings was “Old School” and he didn’t put the right ticks in the right boxes. At the time of our initial approval in 2004, the Regulations were designed for the protection of long term mortgage customers and were not clear in relation to many aspects of short term bridging finance, which is the sole market in which we operate,” said Bridging Loans Ltd.

In reference to the low level of fines, the firm said they were “a proportionate response to the errors identified, and reflect the nature of the FSA’s findings.”

Masthaven – for all your Main Residence Residential Bridging Loans

Bookmark and Share

OFT takes action against illegal cold calling debt firm

November 8th, 2010

The OFT has taken action against a lead generation firm as part of a crackdown on illegal cold calling practices in the debt management sector.

As a result the firm, Compensation Professionals Network Ltd (CPN), no longer holds a consumer credit licence.

CPN’s practices were described as ‘unfair and improper’ by the consumer watchdog, as they were found to be sending automated messages without consent, which implied that their calls were made on behalf of the government.

The OFT said it took action to prevent consumers being misled by the company, as they claimed they were able to write off consumer debts and that these services were free.

The action against CPN follows a previous OFT warning to the debt management industry to stop using unsolicited and misleading cold-calling practices to generate client leads.

The OFT is working with the debt management industry trade associations Debt Managers Standards Association (DEMSA) and Debt Resolution Forum (DRF) to warn member debt management firms that they should only use licensed lead generation firms and that failure to do so could lead to licensing action.

This will be reflected in the OFT’s revised Debt Management Guidance due to be published for consultation next year.

Lead generation firms source information from people looking for debt help or loans and sell this data on to other businesses such as debt management firms.

Ray Watson, Director of the OFT’s Consumer Credit Group, commented on the crackdown, saying: “Misleading or improper lead generation and cold-calling can be real nuisance and cause problems for consumers. The OFT has taken action against CPN to safeguard the interests of consumers.

“Debt management companies should take care to only deal with reputable lead generators that are licensed by the OFT. Failure to do so will put the companies themselves at risk of enforcement action.”

The OFT has worked closely with the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO), which is the lead enforcer on cold-calling.

David Smith, Deputy Commissioner and Director of Data Protection at the ICO said: “We welcome the OFT’s action against CPN. Automated calls promoting debt solutions cause real annoyance and anxiety to individuals. We will continue to work together with the OFT to crack down on these harmful practices.”

For all your bridging loan needs contct Masthaven

Bookmark and Share

Fall in debt judgments welcome news for Northern Ireland

November 8th, 2010

A £2 million fall in the value of debt judgments for the third quarter of 2010 will come as welcome news in Northern Ireland.

According to figures released last week by Registry Trust, the non-profit organisation that collects judgment information from Northern Ireland and other jurisdictions in the British Isles, £7.7 million of debt judgments was issued in the third quarter of 2010 compared with £9.6 million in the same period of 2009.

However, Q3’s figure represents an 18 percent increase on the previous quarter.

Announcing the statistics, chairman of Registry Trust, Malcolm Hurlston, said: “Although this release shows Northern Ireland has recovered from the depths of last year’s situation, more dark clouds are visible on the horizon.

“The Comprehensive Spending Review will hit hard in Northern Ireland. In the coming round of belt-tightening I encourage people to check past debt records on our website before doing business.”

The number of searches performed on the Register by people checking past judgment records exceeded the previous record, reaching 1,888 searches in one quarter.

Masthaven – fast short term loans

Bookmark and Share

Man chains himself to NatWest after being unable to complete mortgage deal

November 8th, 2010

A Twickenham man chained himself to a NatWest branch last week after being refused access to his account, which he urgently needed to complete a mortgage deal.

According to the Richmond and Twickenham Times, Andi Dardha, 28, used a bike lock to chain himself to a pole in the Richmond Branch of NatWest in a desperate attempt to be allowed to withdraw money.

The student says he recently had all of his IDs stolen, except for his student card, and as a result has had difficulty accessing his account.

Speaking to the local paper he said: “There was bank fraud to my account through NatWest – and the money was taken out from the Richmond branch. Now they’ve refunded the money but they aren’t letting me access it.

“I’m a desperate man. I have been saving up for a long time for a mortgage and now it is going through and it is time for me to pay the solicitors but I can’t.

“I can see the money but can’t move it.”

However, staff still couldn’t help the man, leading to him calling the police instead, bringing the bank to a standstill.

The story has echoes of a recent case where a property developer from Dorset built a brick wall over the entrance of a bank of Barclays in a protest against being refused a loan.

Causing much less damage, Mr Dardha was removed from the pole by local police, taken to the station, but later released without charge.

Mr Dardha is still barred from his account, and as Bridging and Commercial understand it, he hasn’t yet been able to access his funds.

A spokesman for NatWest said: “We are looking at resolving this matter as quickly as possible but we cannot comment about specific customers’ accounts.”

Masthaven specialise in residential bridging loans

Bookmark and Share

RBS blocks Gordon Ramsay from selling £3m home amid reported business debts

November 8th, 2010

Celebrity chef Gordon Ramsay has hit headlines again, following revelations that his bank has prevented him putting his £3 million family home on the market.

According to reports in the Daily Mail, the famously volatile TV chef wanted to sell his Battersea home to help repay part of his company debt, but his bank – the Royal Bank of Scotland – took legal steps to prevent him from doing so and registered a unilateral notice on the property.

A unilateral notice can be registered against the title of a property without the consent of the proprietor. It is used as a form for announcing a third party interest in the property and often as a device to prevent a sale and distribution of sale proceeds without the notice holder’s consent.

“Typically a unilateral notice will only be accepted by the land registry if there is a registerable interest to the bank. As the property owner, Mr Ramsay can contest it and call for it to be removed if the bank has no grounds for a registerable interest,” explains Jonathan Newman of Brightstone Law LLP.

RBS has reportedly secured the notice on Mr Ramsay’s seven-bedroom Wandsworth home after granting his company, Gordon Ramsay Holdings, a £10.6 million overdraft in 2006.

Although the house is supposed to be separate and not linked to Gordon Ramsay Holdings (GRH), it is believed that the asset is being used as a form of security by RBS against the firm’s reported £17 million debts – a figure denied by GRH.

A spokesman for GRH confirmed the house was security for the loan, stating: “All of this is entirely commonplace and standard business practice.”

Commenting on the case from a lender’s perspective, Alan Margolis, Head of Bridging at United Trust Bank said: “It is natural for a lender to seek to maximise their security and clearly, we do not know all the facts of this high profile case. It may well bethat by registering the Unilateral Notice, RBS is buying more time for both itself and Mr Ramsay and so avoiding any immediate escalation of the situation.”

Masthaven provide a range of commercial bridging loan solutions

Bookmark and Share

Bridging life – things are on the up!

November 5th, 2010

Residential bridging finance has been experiencing something of a renaissance in recent times. The “old” uses of bridging finance such as chain breaking and the day 1 remortgage are now more a distant memory, as the industry has been seriously keeping up to speed with all that has gone on around it.

Renovation and refurbishment, 100% of auction purchase, payment of tax bills and probate property transactions are all recent examples of where bridging finance is being used nowadays. If you use a good bridging lender who also provides second charge facilities, then there really is no better way to gain short term funding.

There have been casualties along the way in the last few years, as indeed there has wherever you look in all aspects of business. The positive spin to come from all this however is the emergence of a new breed of bridging finance providers who are leaner, hungrier and who will “take a view” on a deal as opposed to treating it as a tick box exercise.

So, all is rosy in the bridging finance world? Well, nearly. There is of course the spectre of regulation looming over all of our non regulated heads. What does it mean, where will it go, what will happen? The general consensus of opinion is that the bridging finance market will be regulated at some point, but with all the uncertainty in the financial industry and indeed the political arena, quite when this will be is anyone’s guess.

The role of the broker in residential bridging finance is more important now than ever before. In past times the brokers role was easily defined, as all he or she had to do was highlight a client who required short term funding, and then almost let nature take its course and let the bridging finance provider do the rest.

The exit route is a much tougher aspect to all bridging loans in these days of post crunch, with virtually no sub prime lenders around, which takes out the refinance option for those with a poor credit history. Then there is the residential market which has tightened LTV’s and criteria for the man in the street consumer as well as the BTL professional landlord.

So what should a broker be doing to ease the path of the client through a bridging loan?

Firstly, establish the real reason the client needs a bridging loan. Bridging loans are in essence short term finance for a client who needs to create liquidity quickly. So whether the client needs to raise money for a tax bill, or needs funds to finish a self build project, or, has put their hand up in an auction and has 28 days to find the rest of the purchase price, is bridging the best, and most cost efficient answer for them?

Often the answer is yes, but does the broker know the best way of finding out the real answer? Most lenders lend their bridging funds at anything between 1 and 2% per month, but the client wants to know what the “deal cost” is going to be. The monthly interest rate is only one small aspect of the overall cost of the loan. What about the arrangement fee, application fee, valuation and legal costs? Is there an exit fee, are there early repayment charges? Is the interest applied monthly or daily, and of course what is the broker themselves charging the client?

If the overall “deal cost” of borrowing the money is acceptable to the client, then it is the brokers prerogative to then source which company will actually complete on the deal. Many bridging loan providers will say they will happily take the deal on, then at the last minute change their mind or go cold on the deal thus costing the client money, and more importantly time.

A good broker always gets the facts up front first. A bridging lender will always ask what the ”story” is behind a loan, always questioning why a client wants to pay high fees and costs to obtain the money in a quick time. The hard working broker will furnish the lender with all the answers generally before application stage so that the lender can make an informed decision on day one and proceed to completion quickly and efficiently.

There are brokers out there who very rarely have to resort to bridging finance, and therefore are uncertain if a bridge is best for their clients. This is where the bridging lender can provide that personal service, going through the deal make up with the broker step by step to help highlight the costs and procedures to them so that they can then inform their client if the bridge is really for them or not.

A recent case we had, detailed below highlights this perfectly:

An introducer phoned us with regard to a client he had, asking if we could help because the client was due in court to be repossessed in 3 weeks time. He informed us that the client had had some very bad luck in various build projects that he was undertaking for various clients and he had literally poured all of his own resources into these projects to get them to work, but unfortunately with no success. He owned a fantastic property in the home counties worth £1.6 million that he had developed to a very high standard, and had a £750,000 first charge mortgage on with circa £100,000 in other unsecured and secured debts that he had built up trying to save his own business. Due to the clients bad luck in his projects he had missed the last 6 months payments on all his credit (including his mortgage) and also obtained 3 county court judgements. He was resigned to selling his house, and had indeed moved in with his family for the time being until his “mess” was sorted out.

The solution we came up with for the client was to take a first charge on his house, pay off his mortgage and all other credit, including the CCJ’s so that he could stop his house being repossessed. We deducted all fees and interest from the advance so that the client did not have to pay anything upfront other than valuation and solicitors costs. He then sold the property, paid us back and had around £700,000 to start all over again with. One very relieved client and one happy broker.

There are many roles which today’s broker can take on within the residential bridging finance sector. As mentioned above, debt management is a very big part of why people take out bridging finance, as long as the exit route is via sale of property. Auction purchases where the subject property is in a non habitable state and the high street lender would put 100% retention on it is a great deal for the bridging lender. Second charge deals where the client has significant equity in either their main residence or indeed investment property that they may own is very often a great way to create liquidity very speedily to raise money for a wide variety of purposes like buying property abroad, paying HMRC, finishing a new build property where funds have dried up, purchasing closed pubs to turn into investment properties….the possibilities are endless.

Some recent industry publications will have you believe that there are now less than 10,000 mortgage broker’s actively trading in the UK. If those figures are anywhere near accurate it is a huge decline from the near 40,000 reported pre crunch. Residential bridging finance may only be a small part of today’s broker’s armoury, but it is nonetheless a vital component that he or she must be aware of and use to the best advantage for their clients.

Bookmark and Share