Bridging Finance News

Landlords prosper through Merlin’s failure

May 27th, 2011

The latest lending statistics have confirmed the predictions of many industry professionals who expected project Merlin to fail from the outset. Simultaneously though Landlords are delighting in the fact that demand for rentals is soaring.

The figures, distributed by the British Bankers’ Association (BBA), showed £47.3 billion in overall business lending during the first quarter from the banks participating in the Merlin agreement – Barclays, RBS, Santander, Lloyds Banking Group and HSBC.

In its reports, the BBA called the figures ‘encouraging’, however, the Daily Mail reported the finer details of what was actually delivered to each sector.

For example the pledged support of £19 billion to SMEs was far from being realised.

The deficit stood at a staggering £25 million each day, including weekends, over the quarter, with SMEs receiving just £16.8 billion.

Rob Lankey, Managing Director of Commercial Mortgages at Aldermore, said: “It has to be a concern that the big banks have already fallen behind in meeting their commitment to lend more to small business under the terms of Project Merlin.

“We at Aldermore also think there is more the government could do to ensure that companies to whom they outsource work pay their sub-contractors, who are frequently small and medium sized businesses, in a timely fashion. There is a lot of talk about supporting SMEs, but I still hear an awful lot of anecdotal evidence that the benefits are not passing through to those companies that need the most help.”

In addition to highlighting the shortfalls of project Merlin, the latest BBA statistics also portrayed the stagnancy of the UK property market, with the numbers showing that mortgage approvals for people buying a new home and switching to a new deal fell by 6 per cent in April - The number of mortgages approved for house purchases stood at 29,355, nearly a fifth lower than in April 2010.

David Brown, commercial director of LSL Property Services, said:“Mortgage approvals have fallen in number and in size over the last year and this is fundamental to the UK’s property market. Lending is constrained for anyone with a modest deposit and this is keeping purchase prices down. Property transactions last month were at their lowest April level since 1995 and this was driven by the difficulty of obtaining mortgage finance for house purchases.”

He added though that the dramatic fall in mortgage approvals when comparing the rates to 2010 were ‘exaggerated’, as the succession of short working weeks that were experienced as a result of the bank holidays meant that activity was ‘artificially subdued’.

“While the picture is hardly rosy, it’s not as bleak as it seems at first glance,” he said.

When taking a birds-eye view of the UK’s business lending based on the first quarter’s figures, the outlook for first time buyers, small businesses, and indeed the economy as a whole, looks bleak.

It seems that the only individuals benefitting from the predicament are the landlords.

Jonathan Moore, director of easyroomate.co.uk, said: “As the private rental sector groans under strain of the influx of frustrated buyers, demand for rental accommodation has become so strong that the average cost of renting a room is now more than £400 per month – a 6% rise in the last year alone. But the pressure on rented accommodation won’t ease until lenders up their commitment to new lending, and provide first-time buyers with the help they need to buy their first home.”

David Brown added: “This has been great news for landlords, who are currently enjoying record high rents as those unable to make a purchase are forced to remain in the private rental sector, where the limited supply of accommodation and the sharp increase in demand over the last year have boosted rental prices. Slow mortgage lending is at the heart of the current trends in the property market.”

Bookmark and Share

Repossessed homes thrown out of the bargain bucket

May 27th, 2011

It has been revealed that purchasing repossessed homes is no longer the cheapest option, with savvy buyers turning to short-leases and part exchange deals instead.

With fluctuating debt and arrears in mortgage repayments, most expect repossessed homes to be a viable investment opportunity.

According to the BBC 9,100 homes were repossessed in the first three months of 2011. Lenders have claimed that this figure is up 15 per cent on the previous quarter. The vast increase has been driven by rising living costs, stunted wages, higher taxes, and an increase in unemployment.

Although some still see these repossessed homes as an investment opportunity,they are no longer the ‘bargain’ purchases they once were, as despite the increase in the number up for resale, the nineties’ price cuts of 25 per cent are a thing of the past. According to the Council of Mortgage Lenders (CML) these distressed properties are now sold between market value and 5 per cent below.

Martyn Alderton of LSL Property Services told The Times: “The diligence and transparency that is required in the sale and marketing of repossessed property now means it is much harder to secure a big discount on the market price.”

Repossessed properties are fetching higher prices at auction than in the nineties due to increasing pressure upon the lenders to attain a better price on behalf of the indebted. The Times has reported that ‘properties are often marketed with a “public notice” after a bid has been received, to encourage counter-bids and raise the price’.

As a result, bargain hunters are looking elsewhere, to part exchanged homes, properties with short leases, and those sold under probate, which can be purchased for around 25 per cent less than market price.

Robin King of Move With Us told The Times: “The attraction of part-exchanged properties is they are usually in great condition because they were lived in by people who sold only so they could trade up.”

Investors are being advised to look passed repossession for bargain investments, with alternative ‘distressed’ properties standing out as a better opportunity.

Bookmark and Share

Broker vs FSA: The £1.7m battle continues

May 27th, 2011

A broker trying to sue the FSA for libel for up to £1.7 million has requested that their latest defence be rejected.

Adam Lucas, the former owner of People Loans, is suing the FSA for loss of revenue and damage to his businesses reputation.

The broker, who had his regulatory permissions cancelled, has challenged the FSA’s decision due to errors on their part related to the treatment of the case.

Mr Lucas, who claimed in February the FSA libelled him by publishing a defamatory decision notice, has had his ability to conduct regulated business frozen.

Mr Lucas failed to pay £1,349.41 in fees and levies which he owed to the FSA which resulted in the decision to cancel his permission to carry out regulated activities. According to the notice these payments were missed “despite repeated requests”.

After the authority publicised the decision on their website, Mr Lucas claims that this was unjust and there were errors in the handling of the case.

Mr Lucas believes that a case for such a substantial sum should have been held in front of a high court judge.

He also claims the date his permissions were cancelled was May 8 2010, which did not match up with the details published in a press release dated March 9 2010.

He is calling for the FSA’s defence to be rejected because the hearing was held in master’s chambers and not in front of a judge.

Mr Lucas does not believe that he was treated according to the specified guidelines; as well as appearing on the regulator’s website in a press notice, his case was widely reported in financial publications.

The FSA claims it removed the notice dated  March 8 from their website and did not issue a press release regarding the case.

The case continues.

Masthaven – FSA regulated bridging loans

Bookmark and Share

NACFB and Masthaven join forces for commercial bridging exclusive

May 3rd, 2011

Masthaven Bridging Finance has agreed an exciting new commercial bridging product, exclusively for members of the NACFB.

The recently FSA regulated, multi award winning lender has agreed a headline rate of 1.1% per month for all commercial bridging loans that can satisfy 4 simple criteria points.

Those points are that the property and/or business must be income producing, and that the owner or 3rd party tenant must have a good local covenant. The LTV is up to 50% and the minimum loan size is £150,000.

Together with their usual criteria of no exit fee and daily interest, Masthaven are hoping that this product breathes new life into what has been for too long a slow and lethargic financial sector.

Richard Deacon, Sales and Marketing Director of Masthaven said “Commercial bridging finance is a sector that Masthaven are really keen on getting more involved in. We have worked with the NACFB for a number of years and have developed a very strong relationship with their members. This is us putting something back into the industry and shows how committed we are to the future of commercial finance, which we believe is very much on the up and up”

Adam Tyler Chief NACFB Chief Executive comments “ We have been looking to establish exclusive arrangements for our members and we welcome this offer from Masthaven. Commercial Bridging is a great market for those who are established in that area and the NACFB will encourage our members to look at this opportunity from our current winner of the NACFB Short Term lender of the Year Award”

Bookmark and Share

Ex-England manager’s adviser blows £10M

April 21st, 2011

According to reports this weekend, a former England football manager is suing his financial adviser for swindling him out of £10M.

The News of The World reported on Sunday that Sven Goran-Eriksson is taking Samir Khan to court after the adviser allegedly accepted ‘unlimited access’ to Sven’s wealth and proceeded to blow £10 million on dubious investments, including property schemes.

The tabloid also claimed to have had exclusive access to court documents which allege that Mr Khan invested a portion of the money into Harry Redknapp’s property firm.

The Spurs boss’s firm, which was predicted to turn profit of £4 million, subsequently lost £4.2 million.

Mr Redknapp confirmed with the News of the World that Sven and Mr Khan had been involved with him and that he was aware of the legal battle between the duo but would not comment further.

Another one of the adviser’s supposed property splurges was a joint investment in a Barbados development, involving costs of £4.75 million for land and £3 million for building.

Mr Khan has denied all claims, including those which suggested he had ‘misappropriated money for a variety of improper purposes, including unsecured loans to other companies for secret profits’ and ‘undertaking loss-making speculations on foreign currency markets’.

Mr Khan was also accused of spending Sven’s money on, amongst other things, luxury cars, helicopter rides, foreign holiday homes and artwork.

In response to the claims, which Mr Khan referred to as ‘nonsense’, he described Sven as being an ‘astute and wordly-wise businessman’ who was ‘very much motivated by the idea of making money’.

This week, it seems that Sven is being portrayed as a serial victim of fraud. Alongside his battle with Mr Khan, reports yesterday revealed that the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) is looking into a complex scam that deceived Sven, former spymaster Sir John Walker and the North Korean government.

Bookmark and Share

Bridging lenders set the tabloid straight

April 21st, 2011

Following an article entitled ‘High-cost bridging loans that tempt trapped movers’, which featured in the internet’s most widely-read UK news site, the Mail Online, the bridging world felt it necessary to offer a more concise view of the industry.

In the Mail’s article, it was suggested that bridging loans were expensive, risky due to a lack of regulation, and also problematic for those with financial difficulties.

However, the tabloid failed to point out the fact that this niche financing option was never intended to be regarded as a long-term solution for the residential market.

Mark Posniak, Head of Marketing and Operations at Dragonfly Property Finance, said: “Bridging loans are in no way designed to be used by investors as a replacement for mainstream mortgages, and those thinking to do so should look elsewhere.

“Property professionals may turn to this type of finance as a means to secure short-term finance on some deals, but they would be doing so because they need funding quickly, and not because they cannot obtain long-term finance elsewhere.”

Christian Faes, Managing Director of Montello, added: “The reality is that most bridging finance borrowers are not getting bridging finance to deal with a ‘financial problem’, but more likely are using it as a way to capitalise on an opportunity – such as the opportunity to buy a property at a discounted price off a receiver, or to complete a purchase at auction.”

The Mail also chose to inform their consumer-based audience that “The Association of Bridging Professionals (AOBP) estimates that just 10 to 15 per cent of business is regulated by the FSA”.

Graham Allen, Managing Director of Commercial Money Matters, commented: “This statement is a red herring. It is true that not all lenders are regulated, but this is due to the fact that they are completing loans on commercial and non-residential property.

“All lenders who deal directly with the public and provide loans on the borrower’s primary residence are regulated by the FSA. According to this regulation, they are required to fully inform any potential borrower as to their terms and conditions through a KFI (Key Features Illustration).”

Terry Markham, Director of The Funding Operation, explained that if the prospective loan applicant was accessing a bridging lender via a broker, then a quality broker would ensure that the pros and cons of the deal, as well as the full costs, were understood by the borrower.

Terry Pritchard, of PWF Finance, added:”Over the past 3 years specialist lending has become more innovative and the lenders and funders in this market have become ever more creative to fulfill individual clients needs, this does not however mean that the broker/adviser forgets their responsibility to the client and my personal experience of advisers in this field and the lenders is that they are all very diligent in their approach to the product suitability for the client, this is demonstrated in the low number of default issues in the sector.”

Another section of the Mail’s article, which several bridging lenders took exception to, was that which portrayed the overly expensive nature of the funding.

Alan Margolis, Head of Bridging at United Trust Bank, said: “Bridging loan costs reflect the fact that lenders are only able to earn interest over a very short period compared to a traditional mortgage and that borrowers are receiving a very bespoke loan tailored to their specific needs.

“A tremendous amount of work is involved in properly underwriting a bridging loan and if required they can be processed and drawn down in very short timescales, beyond the capacity of mainstream lenders.”

The AOBP, the Association of Short Term Lenders (astl), lenders and bridging specialists alike were keen to state that whilst bridging finance is a niche product, it has and will continue to provide a vital source of funding to many borrowers.

James Bloom, Chief Executive of Regentsmead, said: “In the right situation, bridging finance is a vital tool that allows situations to proceed that otherwise would not. A sweeping statement saying that bridging is dangerous would be like saying mortgages are dangerous; for the right situation, bridging finance can be extremely helpful.”

Duncan Kreeger, Chairman of West One Loans, added: “West One Loans, a member of both the astl and the AOBP, specialises in providing vital short-term funding for small businesses and individual property investors who are starved of the cash liquidity they desperately need to grow their portfolios or expand their businesses.

“This pipeline can literally be a life-changing resource for many people in the economic climate.”

The AOBP explained that the most important message to project to potential borrowers was the fact that, since bridging is a specialised product, transparency, at all stages, is paramount.

A spokesperson from the AOBP said: “What is imperative is any customer entering into any financial agreement; especially where rates and terms differ greatly from the traditional high street deals, they enter into the transaction with their eyes wide open.

“The AOBP (the newly formed intermediary Bridging trade body) is actively encouraging introducing brokers and IFA’s to look at both the potential upside and possible pitfalls of bridging finance. There are many instances where a bridging loan can greatly assist to facilitate a house purchase or refinance.

“As long as the customer, intermediary and lender all communicate clearly and effectively and there is a definitive exit strategy in place, bridging finance will always have a place in the market.”

By Katie-Jill Rowland

Bookmark and Share

Property group’s future hangs in the balance

April 21st, 2011

Financial woes have left a Liverpool-based property group’s long-term future highly uncertain.

Property developer Spencer Commercial Property (SCP) faces a “material uncertainty” over its ability to continue trading, after it failed to refinance its £200 million bank facilities.

The group breached its banking covenants last year as plummeting property prices saw nearly £40 million wiped off its property portfolio, the Liverpool Daily Post reports.

The company is now trying to renegotiate its loan facilities, which expired on December 31 last year.

In the auditor’s report at Companies House last week, auditor Anthony Farnworth, of Deloitte, said: “Should no agreement be reached with its bankers, the loan could be called in, which would be likely to result in the realisation of assets below book values.

“These conditions indicate the existence of a material uncertainty which may cast significant doubt about the company’s ability to continue as a going concern.”

For the first for 20 months, SCPs accounts showed a pre-tax loss of £3.5 million for the year ending March 2010, which was caused by a £7.3 million charge from the cancellation of a £60 million interest rate swap.

This, along with other interest charges, meant that 94 per cent of its £15.7 million turnover went on interest payments.

Net assets stood at £2.9 million at the end of the year while creditors due within one year reached £193.2 million, because of the ongoing issue of its bank facilities.

According to the Liverpool Daily Post, SCP said: “While the bank continues to fund the group at the previous levels, negotiations remain ongoing with the group’s bankers, such that the directors anticipate that new facilities will be finalised during 2011 appropriate to secure the group’s funding requirements for the medium term.

“The directors continue to work on and finalise a five-year strategic plan to be agreed by the bank that will form the basis for the new facility, the specific covenants and the repayment profile expected.

The company is maintaining a positive outlook and is drawing up a five-year plan to make a persuasive case for refinancing after its portfolio was revalued at £180.1 million.

SCP continued: “The group’s forecast and projections, taking into account reasonably possible changes in trading performances, show that the group should be able to operate within the level of the proposed facilities.

“On the basis of these forecasts, the ongoing negotiations, and after making enquiries, the directors have a reasonable expectation that the company will have adequate resources to continue in operational existence for the foreseeable future.”

Jim Spencer, former chairman of SCP, stepped down from the board in September last year after over 50 years at the helm. SCP started as the family scrap metal business before it focused on property in the 1980′s.

Bookmark and Share

Housing market feeling dazed and confused

April 19th, 2011

It seems that the most recent predictions of the housing market’s health are at odds, with some reports claiming that things are looking up and others warning us to brace ourselves for the worst.

Consumer confidence in the property market is rising according to a new study, which reveals that 59 per cent of homeowners expect prices to rise.

Nicholas Leeming of Zoopla.co.uk, which conducted the study, said: “After almost nine months of falling confidence and falling house prices, it looks like the property market is now starting to turn a corner. Falling prices have created attractive buying opportunities and with continued low inventory of property on the market, homeowners are increasingly expecting prices to rise in their local area. We still remain somewhat short of the confidence levels seen in early 2010 but there has been a clear improvement over the previous quarter and this is welcome news.”

However, the Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) has reported that it sees no signs of the UK’s property market improving in the near future, and is confident that market growth won’t return to pre-recession levels anytime soon.

RICS spokesperson Ian Perry said: “The rather negative outlook for property prices across the UK seems to better reflect the general economy than the micro climate of London.

“The low level of buyer interest in many parts of the UK continues to impact on the market, resulting in some downward pressure on prices.

“With the prospect of forthcoming interest rate rises and continued shortage of mortgage funding, it seems that the overall recovery for the national housing market is still some way off.”

The institute carried out a survey which found ‘interest from potential buyers was starting to evaporate as sales and house prices stayed relatively flat’.

Mr Perry added: “The survey is based on the answers of over 250 surveyors who work for estate agents around the country and is known to be extremely accurate.

“Within England and Wales, a clear North-South divide is emerging, with London being the only region recording rising prices, demonstrating that the capital Is still operating under different market conditions to the rest of the country.”

Bookmark and Share

Homeowners alerted to dubious ‘Crossroads’ plan

April 19th, 2011

Homeowners have been alerted to the potential repossession risks associated with handing over their property rights to unregulated insurance firms.

A report published by the FSA highlights the operations of one particular company called Asset Income Plan Ltd and their product, ‘Crossroads’.

Asset Income Plan Ltd supposedly pays homeowners an annual income of five per cent based on 50 per cent of the value of their property. But, this is on the condition that the company take a legal charge of the property.

The FSA is concerned that consumers may be persuaded to permit insurance companies to take a legal charge of their homes whilst not fully understanding the implications.

In the case of Crossroads, the legal charge taken against the property is set usually for three to ten years. During this time the homeowner may be at risk of having their property repossessed by the firm.

Despite the company claiming this to be an unlikely scenario and only possible if the firm itself were to become insolvent, and if the capital risk insurance did not cover this, the FSA has yet to confirm whether this is true.

A spokesperson for the FSA said: “The product information explains that Crossroads is not regulated under our rules. This might mean that its advisers and providers do not need to be authorised by us, although there is not enough information currently to confirm that.

“But, if it is correct, you will not be covered under the Financial Services Compensation Scheme or be able to take any complaint to the Financial Ombudsman Service.”

The FSA is continuing its enquiries.

Bookmark and Share

FSA names and shames over 800 firms

April 4th, 2011

In an ongoing effort to increase transparency within the financial sector, the Financial Services Authority (FSA) yesterday published aggregate complaints data as well as firm specific data for H2 2010.

All in all, over 800 firms were listed by name on the FSA website and these firms are now also required to publish the complaints data on their websites.

In order to make the list, a company has to have had 500 or more complaints from customers within a six-monthly reporting period.

The FSA says that most of these complaints were received from retail customers.

The information on the FSA’s website shows aggregate data to cover the total volume of complaints received according to product, type of firm and cause of the complaint.

The data also covers the proportion of complaints resolved and upheld and the total redress paid during this six-month period.

The FSA stated: The FSA is committed to greater transparency where it will benefit consumers. Publishing this data brings complaints to the attention of firms and consumers alike, and gives firms a benchmark and an incentive to improve how they treat their customers and handle complaints.

The aggregate and firm-specific data can be found here on the FSA website.

Bookmark and Share