Property development finance

Deal-focused group brings funders to investors

December 11th, 2012

Last week, the London Property Professionals (LPP) Meet the Money event took place in London and was a great success, setting a strong foundation for future funding forums.

LPP is London’s recently-launched, deal-focused property networking group and is part of the fast-growing UK Property Professionals (UKPP) network.

UKPP, an Edinburgh-based company, specialises in the development of city-specific property networking groups to increase communication and collaboration between all property professionals throughout the UK.

GVA, the main sponsors of the last week’s forum, hosted the event at its offices in Mayfair, London, on Wednesday 28th November 2012, with around 60 people in attendance.

The forum was an exclusive platform for developers and agents to meet the Funding Panel, share opportunities and nurture relationships.

The Funding Panel


(From left to right: James Bloom, Regentsmead Limited; Daniel Norman,Davon Ltd; Steven McColl, Soho Corporate; Noel Meredith, United Trust Bank; Andrew Bloom, Masthaven Bridging Finance; Elliot Hyames, Dragonfly Property Finance; Mark Antscherl, UK Property Professionals)

Opening the session Mark Antscherl, Founder and Chief Executive of UKPP,described how the group started as a modest group of likeminded individuals in Edinburgh which has since rapidly grown to include Glasgow, Aberdeen and London, with plans to launch in a further five cities.

He explained that as development funding continues to be a key area of frustration and concern for developers working in London’s commercial and residential property sectors, the unique Expert Forum was set up to bring together a selection of active funders and investors looking for opportunities.

After Mark’s introduction, each member of the Funding Panel presented a brief introduction to their respective businesses along with a recent case study. After the presentations, there was a networking opportunity which gave the audience the chance to engage and talk directly with the Funding Panel members. Guests discussed their funding requirements, enquiring about development funding and JV development partnerships.

Mark Antscherl told B&C: “We differentiate ourselves by being the only networking and deal-focused property group covering the UK. Membership of a city group not only offers the benefit of networking events and expert forums in the selected city, but also gives access to other city groups and the extended network of members.

“Since launching in April 2010, we have attracted well over 300 subscribed members from over 250 leading companies. We have run over 80 successful and extremely well attended events and have over 8,500 online members, making us the fastest-growing property network in the UK.

“The most important element of our activities is that individuals and companies are connecting and doing business, which is extremely positive and the ultimate gauge of any networking initiative. Launched at an extremely difficult time, UKPP is relevant and beneficial, reflected in the encouraging membership support and sponsorship support.”

Members are invited to all future events. Previous London events have included an evening with serial entrepreneur James Caan, with an insight into his investment plans within the real estate sector, expert forums and ‘Property Question Time’ with leading professionals about areas such as the London residential property market, private and institutional investments, commercial property, senior debt and property fund management.

To find out more about UK Property Professionals, the different cities linked to the network, its membership and future events, click here.

Source: www.bridgingandcommercial.co.uk

Bookmark and Share

‘Toxic assets’ force Clydesdale to withdraw from commercial market

November 5th, 2012

A bank which funds a number of bridging lenders has withdrawn funding for the renovation of a listed building, reported The Herald.

Clydesdale Bank, which provides funding lines to bridging lenders Cheval, Masthaven and previously Tiuta, has prematurely called in a loan it lent to fund the renovation of Dallars House in Hurlford, Scotland, after it was inherited by Iain Richards and his brother.

The retraction of lending came after Clydesdale’s parent company, National Australia Bank (NAB) Group, took control of Clydesdales’s commercial real estate portfolio when elements of “toxic assets” forced the firm to restructure its balance sheet, the title reported.

The brothers were initially helped by Clydesdale, their family bank, to fund a £250,000 renovation and flat conversion project for the upper floors of the listed property, which was backed by Historic Scotland.

The bank agreed to lend a further £115,000 in July 2011 to facilitate further rennovation, indicating that a one-year development loan would automatically convert into a ten-year, fixed term debt in August 2012.

A year later however, the bank informed Mr Richards that it would call in the loan after a three-month emergency extension on the facility, which is due to expire this week.

Clydesdale has also asked for Dallars House, which is valued at £700,000, to be formally valued to establish it as sufficient security for the £115,000 loan.

According to The Herald, Clydesdale also re-categorised the loan as commercial upon requesting that Mr Richards change his personal account to a business account and then claimed he had “no history” with the account.

Speaking about the recalled development loan, Mr Richards said: “Last week, over the course of several phone calls, they have finally told me the best we will get is six months. The explanation I have been given is that NAB Group is restructuring its balance sheet because of elements of ‘toxic assets’ within its commercial property portfolio.”

He continued: “I appreciate that I am just a minnow in this ocean of financial chaos, but this uncertainty and shifting of goal posts is causing me great stress.

“I have banked with the Clydesdale Bank for more than 36 years and, for the whole period of loans relating to Dallars House since 1996, not one payment has been missed or late.

“If I had been aware in June last year of the fragility of both the NAB Group and Clydesdale Bank we would not have asked them for these funds. My brother and I have fulfilled our side of the bargain but have been badly let down by the Clydesdale Bank. What use is a bank that refuses to lend money?” Mr Richards added.

A spokesman for Clydesdale Bank said: “We never guarantee future lending as these decisions are dependent on the circumstances at the time of application. Our withdrawal from the commercial real estate market was a strategic decision, not a reflection on particular customer relationships.”

The title also reported that the bank said the restructuring would only affect “commercial real estate customers, not people who happen to have a property they use for their business”.

 

Bookmark and Share

‘It isn’t a crime to make a profit’, says mortgage expert

July 26th, 2012

Some measures to prevent fraud and an underlying aversion to profiting from property transactions may be prohibiting lenders from getting deals done, according to mortgage expert and Director of HCM (Northern) Limited Grahame Harwood.

Grahame explains exactly why…

I have no doubt that a good few people within the property finance industry are familiar with the six month rule. For those who haven’t come across this, the Council of Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook requires that conveyancing solicitors report any transactions where the property being purchased has been owned for less than six months by the current owner (vendor).

This rule is in the CML Handbook so that lenders may double check all of the facts and figures. In a situation where a property has been owned for a short period prior to being sold there is potential for fraud. Prior to the credit crunch in 2008/09 many lenders chose to ignore the six month rule. As a result there are numerous cases where property valuations have been inflated to the ultimate detriment of lenders.

It is now the case that the vast majority of lenders are now rigidly adhering to the six month rule contained within the CML Handbook. And irrespective of whether the property valuations stack up, lenders will not entertain a mortgage application until a property has been owned for at least six months.

However, there is at least one exception. This occurs when a lender states that there shall be no increase in the property price. The vendor would therefore be required to sell the property at the exact same price they paid for it. This approach certainly deals with eradicating potential fraud via inflated property valuations. The ‘about turn’ by lenders over the last few years has certainly been to the advantage of bridging loan providers.

It seems that there may still be a way to make an honest living from buying a property at a genuine discount and selling it on. For instance, it isn’t a crime to make a profit. Therefore, even if a lender states that a property owned for less than six months must be sold without any increase in value, there is still the potential to charge a finder’s fee. This is true for the lender that is the exception, who does not specifically state that a finder’s fee must be reported. In contrast, all of the residential and buy-to-let lenders within the Lloyds TSB Group would specifically require the reporting of finder’s fees, and if a finder’s fee is being paid none of these lenders will provide a mortgage.

Will any lenders, commercial or residential, be prepared to stand up and lend against a genuine open market value where a property has been owned for a short period – less than six months – and there is genuine reason as to why the sale price is greater than the acquisition price?

There are many budding ‘buy-to-let’ investors interested in property as an investment vehicle. Yields on property in respect of rental income combined with the prospect of future ‘real’ capital growth makes property a very attractive investment at present (real capital growth: growth in line with or greater than inflation).

Bookmark and Share

Dragon brokers £46m development deal

July 26th, 2012

A TV star from the BBC show Dragons’ Den has brokered a £46 million purchase of a student village in Canterbury, in what amounts to one of the biggest property deals the city has ever seen.

After lengthy talks with developers Pavilion Property Group, millionaire and TV dragon James Caan successfully secured a deal for the 800-bedroom complex for 90 North Real Estate’s Kuwaiti backers Dimah Capital.

A source reportedly told Kent Online that the site is set to relieve pressure on housing stock as the area, which currently has 16 buildings, looks set to provide 600 additional student bedrooms.

Mr Caan, famous for his role on the BBC’s popular reality investment programme, is also chairman of 90 North Real Estate – an independent investment advisory firm specialising in Shari’ah compliant real estate investments.

Philip Churchill, founder partner of 90 North, told Kent Online: “Canterbury is a long-established centre for education and we are delighted to work with Pavilion Property Group to provide quality student housing and build value for our clients.

“What attracted us was Canterbury’s long tradition as a centre of educational excellence, which has resulted in a number of quality universities in the city.

“90 North is looking at opportunities to further improve the impressive accommodation and facilities at the student village, working with our university tenants to determine their wishes.

“This may include future development phases, but for the moment we are delighted to have made a significant investment into the Canterbury student accommodation market.”

John Gilbey, city council leader, reportedly said he was “staggered” at the city’s level of investment.

Bookmark and Share

England cricket captain faces £14m property debts

July 17th, 2012

A former England captain has appeared in court over £14 million of debts that he accrued from a disastrous property venture.

Adam Hollioake, who is an ex-captain of Surrey and the England one-day cricket team, was declared bankrupt last year, and this week he appeared in court to confirm how much money is owed to each of his 40 creditors, reported the Daily Mail.

Mr Hollioake, 40, gave up cricket and returned to Australia, where he was born, to go into a property development business in 2004.

He captained Surrey between 1997 and 2003, winning three County Championships, and led the England team in one-day internationals. He also represented his country in Test matches.

Mr Hollioake then retired after his father, John, suggested he could receive a salary of around £100,000 a year if he joined him in a property development company.

He had doubled his money on a house sale in 1994 and believed he could do it again. “I was a genius – or so I thought”, he said, according to the Mail.

However, the venture soon turned sour and from living a life of luxury, with more than one home on each side of the Australian continent, he and his family now own no property and are renting.

Mr Hollioake said last week: “The lawyers representing the creditors in court yesterday wanted to know where every cent had gone and it was not a pleasant experience. They wanted to know everything about my life, almost down to how many times I went to the toilet.”

Since his bankruptcy, he said, attempts had been made ‘by enemies’ to paint him as a criminal, but he insisted: “I’m no crook. My life is an open book.”

He opened his wallet and added: “This is all I have left – just a few dollars. Yet there have been claims that I’ve ripped people off, run away with their money, got it all tucked away, secretly loaded myself up.”

He said he was a victim of the global financial crisis, adding: “What happened was mostly out of my hands, although I accept that I did not apply the same professionalism in my business affairs as I did in my cricket.”

He now reportedly admits that he made a ‘massive error’.

His firm was liquidated in September 2010 and among his creditors is former England and Surrey teammate Alec Stewart, whose claim is estimated to be more than £400,000.

“Alec understands the position I got myself into, as do the other creditors, apart from one who is determined to stamp me into the ground,” Hollioake said.

Hollioake’s determination to fight the damage to his reputation was not helped when it was revealed that he had tried to leave the country without the permission of his bankruptcy trustee, and had been stopped by Australian Federal Police.

He said: “In fact, I had no idea I wasn’t allowed to leave after being declared bankrupt.

“I was actually on my way to Papua New Guinea to do some charity work, but when it was pointed out to me that travel was not allowed without explicit permission I realised I had made an innocent error.”

He added: “In two years I’ll be free of bankruptcy and the first thing I plan to do is to shake the hands of people who have lost money through my property ventures.

“I am trying to establish whether I am legally entitled to try to pay them back after I have been dismissed from bankruptcy but either way I feel very badly about what has happened and I hope that I can clear the air with those creditors one way or the other.”

Hollioake has even taken up cage fighting in an attempt to scrape some money together. He said: “Cage fighting doesn’t pay all that well. It hurts, physically, at times, but I haven’t got my head knocked off yet.”

Bookmark and Share

Exclusivity claim causes £5m property dispute

October 28th, 2011

A property developer has lost a multi-million pound lawsuit as a result of planning to “rip off” a holy order and an heiress over Fawley Court, a High Court judge has ruled.

The house, which is thought to have been designed by Sir Christopher Wren and may have inspired Toad Hall in the book The Wind in the Willows, has been the home of the Roman Catholic Marian Fathers for 55 years.

Richard Butler-Creagh, from Kingwood, made an initial successful bid, at £22.5 million, to purchase the property and its 60-acres of land, near Henley in Oxfordshire, when it was put up for sale in 2008.

However, Mr Justice Eady said the purchase was based on a “lie” that his offer was backed by the Bank of Ireland. He continued by saying that Mr Butler-Creagh then set about finding a “rich punter” to “step into his shoes” and take over the purchase for a lucrative fee, reported the Henley Standard.

In October 2008 he met Iranian heiress Aida Hersham, a property investor, in Henley and began negotiating with her to take over the bid for the house, which the judge said had been greatly over-valued.

He had claimed to have the benefit of an exclusivity arrangement with the vendors so that only he could buy it. He claimed that he was approached by Mrs Hersham, and agreed to facilitate her purchase for a fee of £5m. He also claimed to have negotiated the price down on her behalf.

Mrs Hersham, whose company Cherrilow Ltd, ended up paying £13 million when it acquired the 17th century house in April last year. Subsequently, Mr Butler-Creagh launched a lawsuit against Mrs Hersham claiming that she had agreed to pay him £5 million for allowing her to take over his interest and for “facilitating” the sale, reported the BBC.

The High Court heard that by the time Mrs Hersham had begun expressing interest in buying Mr Butler-Creagh lost his right to “exclusivity” and to lock other potential purchasers out of the deal.

On speaking about the case Mr Justice Eady said: “She too was to be deceived into thinking that Mr Butler-Creagh still had exclusivity or a ‘lock out’ agreement, which meant that she had to deal with him.

“The intention was to ‘rip off’ both her and Marian Fathers, although I suspect that in Mrs Hersham he had met his match.”

Mr Butler-Creagh’s plan to make £5 million “for doing effectively nothing” failed as the High Court in London dismissed his claim saying he had concocted a scheme to earn this sum as commission. He had placed himself between the ultimate purchaser and the Marian Fathers because he knew that he couldn’t acquire Fawley Court on his own. He had deceived the Marian Fathers by giving them the false impression that he had the means and the intention to purchase the property himself by pretending that he was a necessary intermediary.

“In truth, and in law, he had no other role than as an ‘officious bystander’”, the judge said.

The judge allowed a claim for deceit against Mr Butler-Creagh by Cherrilow, which claims it is almost £10million out of pocket.

Mrs Hersham said after the hearing: “This fraud neither deserved nor warranted the public forum it received. Having gone through such a traumatic experience, it is going to take some time to get back to normal life. Once I have caught my breath, I intend to focus all of my energies on the restoration of Fawley Court.”

Mr Butler-Creagh said: “There are numerous points of law that my lawyers and I feel justify contesting and we will be appealing the decision.

“However, I am very concerned about the impact on my own personal reputation as implied in the court’s interpretation of events.

“In particular, I repudiate the suggestion that I had no chance of developing the project myself and was looking for a ‘rich punter’ to be talked into an unrealistic deal.

“I had several concepts for Fawley Court, including developing it as a hotel, and had both the experience and potential investors to explore this and other options.”

He could now face a multi-million compensation claim by the company but says he will appeal.

Bookmark and Share

£17k to £24m – The lows and highs of bridging finance

October 28th, 2011

Today sees ‘the cheapest home in Britain’ up for auction with an asking price of £7,000. The mid-terrace property is in the Welsh Village of Maerdy, in the Rhondda Valley. Last week, also saw a former ambassadorial property in Kensington, valued at £75 million, possibly becoming the world’s most expensive ‘fixer upper’ requiring £10m of further renovation.

In this light, we at Bridging & Commercial wanted to ask some of the lenders in the industry what have been the lowest and highest loan enquiries they have received and on the same scale which bridging loans have they actually completed.

Yasin Patel, Director at Mayfiar Bridging, told us the “smallest enquiry we have had is £6000, however our minimum loan amount is £25,000 and is the smallest loan we have done. The good thing about small deals is that there are never complications; most people can easily fit on the affordability on a £25,000 loan.

Richard Deacon,Sales & Marketing Director at Masthaven Bridging Finance, stated: “The smallest enquiry we have received was for £15,000 but our minimum loan size is £50,000, so I don’t think we would be much help with any of the really small stuff.”

Richard King, Business Development Executive at Bridgebank Capital, answered: “The smallest amount we will advance is £30k at 65%, and at the other end of the scale we have completed a number of deals at £2m at 60% LTV. For us though, the size of the deal is not important, and we have a real appetite for lending on heavy refurb scenarios or unmortgageable properties. Our market leading Renov8 product allows subsequent drawdowns in line with the increase in value as works are done.”

Lucy Barrett, Director at Vantage Finance, divulged: ”We get enquiries for loans as low as £10,000, but typically lenders will have a minimum loan requirement of £25,000 to £50,000 to make it worthwhile doing, and the smallest loan which we have completed is £25,000.  Some lenders are in a position that they do not have to put a cap on their maximum loan size and deals are being done for many millions by lenders, where some prefer not to be too exposed on any one deal and restrict to say £1million per deal.”

Colin Sanders, Chief Executive Officer of Omni Capital, told us the smallest and largest enquiries they’ve received “have ranged for loans valued at several tens of thousand pounds up to multi-million pound sums. This is hardly surprising given that our published criteria offer bridging products from £75,000 on a 2nd charge basis and up to £7.5million on a 1st charge basis.”

In regards to the largest loan enquiry they’ve received, Richard Deacon told us, “We recently issued some terms on a £23,000,000 bridge for a property in central London which was (obviously) very nice!! Sadly the deal didn’t go anywhere in the end as the make-up of the purchase changed somewhat over the weeks from introduction.”

Christian Faes, Managing Director of Montello, said: “At Montello, our transaction sizes vary, as we are running a pool of money and need to manage an efficient spread across the portfolio to ensure that risk is mitigated. Having said that, the largest loan that we have completed is £4.8m; and the smallest was about £40,000. So the size of our preferred transaction changes, but we are generally able to cover a wide spread of the market.”

Yasin Patel added: “The highest loan amount enquiry we have had is £130m on a very exclusive hotel in central London but as we only do £500,000 maximum at the moment, but we had to unfortunately decline that loan. Usually bridging loans are in the region of £250k and £400k that’s the norm we have found. Investors realise the cost of bridging is high and on the large loans payments are very high per month.”

Colin Sanders stated: “Omni Capital recently completed a second charge bridging loan valued at £5million. It was introduced by specialist distributor Brightstar Financial, and exhibited a high degree of ‘packager-lender’ co-operation during the application process.

“As an intermediary-centric lender, we entertain all genuine enquiries and pride ourselves on our flexibility. Our current lending portfolio comprises a balanced blend of both high and lower value loans – a position with which we’re highly comfortable.”

Richard Deacon told us that in his career “the smallest [loan] I know of completed is £15,000 from Holme Financial, and the largest I’ve heard of was Drawbridge and a £24 million loan.

“As a general rule the larger deals are much more difficult to see through to drawdown simply because the client will do as much as they can to avoid actually using the bridge. 9 times out of 10 they look at a bridge as a last resort to help them out, but at that high level, the cost is so prohibitive, they often look for other opportunities to “get them over the line” in whatever deal it is they are after.”

The £7,000 property in Wales “may be the cheapest home in the UK, but could need somewhere between £25,000 and £50,000 spent on it to make it legally inhabitable” exclaimed property analyst Nigel Lewis at FindaProperty.com to The Daily Mail. The building’s low cost classes it as a “desperation home”, said Mr Lewis, making it an ideal opportunity for an investor to renovate the property and rent it out on the UK’s booming buy-to-let market. “Even if the total cost ends up being £50,000, they may be able to rent it out for £300-400 a month and still make a good return,” he added.

The Kensington property, No.1 Campden Hill, is a rare opportunity but not one for an impatient buyer, believes Peter Mackie, managing director for Property Vision, which specialises in finding homes for the wealthy. He said: “It’s an impressive property and the quality of the garden makes it very special – it’s like a country home in the centre of London. But anyone buying it must have an appetite for work; there is no instant gratification with Campden Hill. The work, based on the planning, will probably take at least 14 months to complete and cost an eight-figure sum,” reported the Metro. When finished it will include a pool, squash court, cinema, wine cellar, gym and even a nightclub. There is also a three-bedroom cottage for the staff located in the 3,000 square metre garden.

Bookmark and Share

Exclusivity claim causes £5m property dispute

October 28th, 2011

A property developer has lost a multi-million pound lawsuit as a result of planning to “rip off” a holy order and an heiress over Fawley Court, a High Court judge has ruled.

The house, which is thought to have been designed by Sir Christopher Wren and may have inspired Toad Hall in the book The Wind in the Willows, has been the home of the Roman Catholic Marian Fathers for 55 years.

Richard Butler-Creagh, from Kingwood, made an initial successful bid, at £22.5 million, to purchase the property and its 60-acres of land, near Henley in Oxfordshire, when it was put up for sale in 2008.

However, Mr Justice Eady said the purchase was based on a “lie” that his offer was backed by the Bank of Ireland. He continued by saying that Mr Butler-Creagh then set about finding a “rich punter” to “step into his shoes” and take over the purchase for a lucrative fee, reported the Henley Standard.

In October 2008 he met Iranian heiress Aida Hersham, a property investor, in Henley and began negotiating with her to take over the bid for the house, which the judge said had been greatly over-valued.

He had claimed to have the benefit of an exclusivity arrangement with the vendors so that only he could buy it. He claimed that he was approached by Mrs Hersham, and agreed to facilitate her purchase for a fee of £5m. He also claimed to have negotiated the price down on her behalf.

Mrs Hersham, whose company Cherrilow Ltd, ended up paying £13 million when it acquired the 17th century house in April last year. Subsequently, Mr Butler-Creagh launched a lawsuit against Mrs Hersham claiming that she had agreed to pay him £5 million for allowing her to take over his interest and for “facilitating” the sale, reported the BBC.

The High Court heard that by the time Mrs Hersham had begun expressing interest in buying Mr Butler-Creagh lost his right to “exclusivity” and to lock other potential purchasers out of the deal.

On speaking about the case Mr Justice Eady said: “She too was to be deceived into thinking that Mr Butler-Creagh still had exclusivity or a ‘lock out’ agreement, which meant that she had to deal with him.

“The intention was to ‘rip off’ both her and Marian Fathers, although I suspect that in Mrs Hersham he had met his match.”

Mr Butler-Creagh’s plan to make £5 million “for doing effectively nothing” failed as the High Court in London dismissed his claim saying he had concocted a scheme to earn this sum as commission. He had placed himself between the ultimate purchaser and the Marian Fathers because he knew that he couldn’t acquire Fawley Court on his own. He had deceived the Marian Fathers by giving them the false impression that he had the means and the intention to purchase the property himself by pretending that he was a necessary intermediary.

“In truth, and in law, he had no other role than as an ‘officious bystander’”, the judge said.

The judge allowed a claim for deceit against Mr Butler-Creagh by Cherrilow, which claims it is almost £10million out of pocket.

Mrs Hersham said after the hearing: “This fraud neither deserved nor warranted the public forum it received. Having gone through such a traumatic experience, it is going to take some time to get back to normal life. Once I have caught my breath, I intend to focus all of my energies on the restoration of Fawley Court.”

Mr Butler-Creagh said: “There are numerous points of law that my lawyers and I feel justify contesting and we will be appealing the decision.

“However, I am very concerned about the impact on my own personal reputation as implied in the court’s interpretation of events.

“In particular, I repudiate the suggestion that I had no chance of developing the project myself and was looking for a ‘rich punter’ to be talked into an unrealistic deal.

“I had several concepts for Fawley Court, including developing it as a hotel, and had both the experience and potential investors to explore this and other options.”

He could now face a multi-million compensation claim by the company but says he will appeal.

Bookmark and Share

Financial advisor and property developer among SOCA arrests

September 16th, 2011

A property developer in Liverpool has been arrested as part of a probe into fraud by the Serious Organised Crime Agency (SOCA), reports the Liverpool Echo.

Sam Beilin was one of seven people arrested in the operation, which was connected with an investigation into fraud and conspiracy.

The 49-year-old, who has been declared bankrupt, was released on bail pending further enquiries, along with the other six people concerned.

Although the identities of most of the seven have not been made public, the Liverpool Echo have learnt that one of the people is a 55-year-old financial advisor named Alan Parkinson.

Mr Beilin’s home and offices, along with premises in Wavertree, which were carried out on August 23and 24 in conjunction with Merseyside Police and Revenue and Customs.

Mr Beilin was director of numerous Liverpool property businesses, a former chairman of the Harold House Jewish Youth Centre and a fundraiser for the NSPCC. He was declared bankrupt with £1m worth of debts, after a petition by Liverpool based accountant Melville Morris.

Mr Beilin has also been a director of a number of property companies in both Liverpool and Manchester, including Euston Square Properties and Honey Properties, which has its registered offices in Manchester.

Bookmark and Share

Prominent tycoon folds multimillion pound property business

June 20th, 2011

After declaring real estate an unattractive ‘avenue’ to pursue at the moment, the former right-hand man of the Tchenguiz brothers has shut down his corporate finance and property advisory firm, Three Delta.

Paul Taylor told his staff on Tuesday morning that they would soon be made redundant as the business wound down. The staff will be paid in full.

Mr Taylor confirmed the surprise move to Estates Gazette: “The decision was voluntary and was not made under adverse circumstance – there is no debt or anything else that forced the decision.”

He continued: “There are better avenues than real estate to pursue at the moment that are a lot more viable.”

Just before its closure, Three Delta was not operating as a property management company, and only ran an asset finance business.

It is likely that employees were extremely shocked by the shut down, as the company had taken steps to raise funds for an opportunistic property fund and a core property fund.

In pursuing the core property fund, Three Delta had hired a firm from Invista Real Estate to support the venture.

Property Week reported that a source close to the company said that the market for highly leveraged, structured finance and opco-propco deals had dried up, and that Taylor would pursue other businesses.

Paul Taylor’s notoriety within the property sector was first shown when, in 2000, he became a key lieutenant to Robert and Vincent Tchenguiz, having left his position at Natwest’s structured finance business to become chief executive of Rotch, the Tchenguiz’ private business.

His name was once again in the spotlight when, after leaving the Tchenguiz brothers’ company in 2006 to establish Three Delta, his firm was the adviser to multiple highly leveraged deals undertaken by the Qatar Investment Authority (QIA), including the £1.4bn purchase of Four Seasons, a portfolio of care homes which were mostly occupied by Southern Cross.

Most of three Delta’s issues are thought to have arisen following the failure of the company’s £10.6 billion buyout of Sainsbury’s on behalf of QIA.

The QIA withdrew from Three Delta in June 2008 and whilst Taylor clearly attempted to reposition the company, his future business efforts shall be focused elsewhere.

Bookmark and Share