Bridging Finance News

Mortgage Rescue Scheme latest victim of Government spending cuts

July 23rd, 2010

A scheme brought in at the beginning of 2009 to help homeowners facing repossession has had its funding cut under the new coalition government.

The Mortgage Rescue Scheme was devised under the previous Labour government to help tackle repossession problems worsened by the recession. It lets struggling homeowners sell their property to a council or housing association and remain living there as tenants.

Housing minister Grant Shapps confirmed that the government grant for each home bought under the scheme would be reduced, although the total kitty was unchanged.

The proportion of government funding for each home bought by a housing association will drop from 65% to 55%.

Mr Shapps defended the cuts, saying the scheme was being “refocused” and that the fall in funding for individual houses will enable more people to take part in the scheme.

He said: “The most effective thing the government can do for homeowners is to tackle the record deficit and avoid the need for rapid increases in interest rates.”

Figures show that since its launch a year and a half ago, the Mortgage Rescue Scheme has helped 629 households. Ministers originally projected that up to 6,000 homes could be helped by the scheme.

According to figures released at the end of March, a further 1,849 applications were “ongoing”.

Ben Smith, from sale and rent back firm DFB Housing Solutions, said that the difference in funding would have a “massive effect” on struggling homeowners.

He added: “With an LTV of 55%, many people won’t have the opportunity to get out of their situation. I think the reason why the scheme hasn’t been more successful is down to having the wrong LTV and not many people knowing about it.”

Government support schemes have been attributed for keeping the number of repossessions down, compared to the recession of the early 1990s.

Figures from the Council of Mortgage Lenders (CML) showed that the number of homes repossessed in the UK declined by 7.5% in the first quarter of 2010 to 9,300. 10,600 houses were repossessed in the last quarter of 2009.

Masthaven is a competitive and quick way to meet your bridgingm loan requirements

Bookmark and Share

£3.7m of compensation secured for victims of unauthorised scheme

July 23rd, 2010

The Financial Services Authority (FSA) has secured £3.717 million in compensation for investors in an unauthorised collective investment scheme operated by Upton & Co. Accountants Limited.

A High Court ruling confirmed the immediate distribution of £3.717 million to investors on a pro rata basis. Upton has also agreed to make further monthly payments of £10,000 which will be returned to investors in due course.

The Wakefield based firm, which has never been authorised by the FSA, operated a collective investment scheme known as the “Currency Plan” promising investors high rates of return. The money was to be used to invest in foreign exchange markets. However, limited foreign exchange trading occurred and very little was ever returned in cash.

Darren Upton, a member of the Association of Chartered Certified Accountants, owned and controlled the firm.

Margaret Cole, director of Enforcement and Financial Crime, described the outcome as “fantastic”, saying: “It is so rare for victims of unauthorised businesses to get any money back because normally the money is misappropriated and victims of unauthorised firms are not protected by the Financial Services Compensation Scheme.

“But as we intervened early in the scheme’s life cycle we were able to recover a large proportion of the original amount invested. Normally the amount recovered – if any – is often just a few pence in the pound so securing this amount is a real coup.”

In February 2009 the FSA commenced an investigation into Upton and soon realised that the firm was carrying out unauthorised business. A month later, the FSA secured a High Court injunction to stop the activity and freeze the firm’s assets.

In March 2010 the FSA reached an agreement with Upton for the firm to pay compensation of £3.6 million immediately and a further £840,000 in monthly instalments.

Margaret Cole continued: “Operating a collective investment scheme is a serious business involving the management of a number of investments and requiring FSA authorisation. Upton had no business running one of these schemes and the firm risked millions of pounds of investors’ money – something you’d expect a firm of accountants to know better.”

A collective investment scheme enables a group of investors to pool their assets with a view to sharing the profits. Participants do not have day to day control over the management of the assets, something that is carried out by an FSA authorised operator. Upton was performing that function without approval.

Masthaven is a competitive and quick way to meet your bridgingm loan requirements

Bookmark and Share

Midlands Housing Association launches Facilities Management Company

July 20th, 2010

The Midlands Housing Association has collaborated with Martin Corbett to launch Derwent FM, a Facilities Management company. The new company plans to launch affordable housing schemes for the common man. Martin Corbett will own 25% in the new venture, while Centro Place investments and Derwent Living’s investment company will have 75%.

Martin Corbett has over 15 years of experience in this industry while Derwent Living has been managing and providing services to 11,000 homes. Derwent FM will function as a subsidiary company under the Derwent Living group of business and will be managed by Paul Wisher, Commercial Director of Derwent Living, Martin Corbett and Paul Casey, Director, Derwent Living Development.
Derwent FM will be focussing on the student accommodation market in the Midlands and the South.

Talking about this new venture, Paul Wisher said, “Our forecasts show that in six years, Derwent FM will be turning over £20 million to £25 million, which means there will be a large amount of profit to go back to support the core social housing part of the business.”

Find a range of bridging loans on our website for your property needs.

Bookmark and Share

Chartered surveyor accused of £3m mortgage fraud

July 19th, 2010

A chartered surveyor has been accused of “massively inflating” the value of a Staffordshire luxury manor house in order to dupe the prestigious Yorkshire Bank into giving out a £3m remortgage.

A member of the Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors, sixty-six-year-old Christopher Jarvis, of Hawcroft in Staffordshire, denies the charge of fraud brought against him at Stafford County Court this week.

He is accused of pricing Barn Beak Manor at nearly three and half times more than what other independent surveyors priced the property.

The court heard how Mr Jarvis valued the property at £4.25m when, according to Miss Jane Bewsey QC, other independent chartered surveyors came up with a best price of £1.3m. The property belonged to Paul Cope, a Stafford-based financier whose application for the remortgage was approved by Yorkshire Bank in January of 2008, following the £4.25 valuation.

The court heard how Mr Cope originally bought the Staffordshire manor in 2001 for £425,000 with a mortgage of £350,000. However, the couple continued to buy up the surrounding land, therefore raising the estate’s value.

As a result it was remortgaged several times and at the end of 2007 Mr Cope approached Yorkshire Bank for the £3m remortgage. The valuation report that accompanied the application, written by Mr Jarvis, read: “large detached country manor, significantly extended in the modern manner, set in 19 acres”

Its features included a detached lodge residence, indoor and outdoor swimming pools, tennis courts, landscaped gardens, a substantial children’s tree house, terraces, a top of the range security system with electric gates, a gymnasium and solarium, a planetarium with a telescope, a two-storey office suite and boardroom, an alpaca paddock and “a 500m sweeping driveway”.

Mr Jarvis told the court that he believed the property to be “one of the best, if not the best in the Stafford area, with a standard of fittings considered to be peerless.”

He also said that he had been in the business for 42 years without ever having been investigated before. In an interview with the police he said: “It was done by me in the full knowledge of what I was looking at. There were no comparisons in this instance, because it was such a unique property. This was my genuine belief it was its true worth at the time. I strongly disagree with the valuation of £1.2m.”

However, Jarvis also admitted that his ‘doctorate’ had in fact been bought by a “Mickey Mouse” university in America and he is currently suspended from RICS.

Miss Bewsey said Jarvis had “a long standing business relationship going back over a number of years” with Cope.

“It’s the Crown’s case that Jarvis agreed with Cope to produce a valuation report giving that massively inflated valuation in order for Cope to secure that £3m advance.”

The case continues.

Masthaven is a competitive and quick way to meet your bridgingm loan needs.

Bookmark and Share

Misleading debt management firm rapped by OFT

July 19th, 2010

The OFT has imposed requirements on a debt management company, Carefree Group Ltd, in respect of its advertising of debt management services.

The requirements also apply to an associated licensee, trading as Carefree Debt Solutions, and cover all types of advertising, including websites.

As a result of the requirements the OFT has imposed, Carefree Group Ltd’s advertising and promotional materials must not claim or imply that the service is free if a fee is payable at any stage and include details of all fees prominently in the advertisement

The firm has also been banned from claiming or implying that savings will be made by rescheduling debts, without making it equally clear that this will lead to an increase in the sum to be repaid and the length of the repayment period.

Carefree has also come under fire for stating that it could guarantee a favourable outcome when negotiating with creditors

The OFT also ruled that it could not claim that the debtor will be debt free in a certain period of time without explaining the adverse consequences on a consumer’s credit rating, and that Carefree Group must explain all of the advantages and disadvantages of each debt solution when providing advice to the consumer.

The West Yorkshire-based company, whose website is currently under construction, does not appear to be too notorious on consumer forums, although one consumer called Linda posting on iva.co.uk branded the group “rude”, writing: “Received a phone call from these people when I got home from work, I think they have been mentioned before. It was very unprofessional and I was also very annoyed as he said, ‘Is that Linda?’, when I replied he said he was from the Carefree Group and he was calling about my IVA.

“I put the phone down on him but felt very angry as I could have been anybody on the phone. How about data protection?”

Ray Watson, Director of the OFT’s Consumer Credit Group said: “The OFT will not hesitate to take action against any debt management business which uses material that misleads consumers. The requirements imposed on Carefree Group Ltd will ensure that the company’s advertising will not in future contain claims that are inaccurate. We will monitor these requirements closely and take further action if necessary.”

Masthaven is a competitive and quick way to meet your bridgingm loan needs.

Bookmark and Share